this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
57 points (86.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5205 readers
710 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
57
Unintended warming: How reduced ship [sulfate aerosol] emissions may accelerate climate change (cpo.noaa.gov)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

... on NOAA.gov?

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

During an administration that doesn't doubt climate science, no less

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not American. I don't know much about the history of the body, who runs it or whether leadership changes under different administrations. I also do not know the scientists and whether they are completely state funded or there is industry funding anywhere (on this, or on previous or future research papers). I'm asking questions. I looked at the paper and usually it has a section on conflicts of interest, even to state that none exist. I couldn't see that section on this paper.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

For future reference: they're the weather guys. They're probably the least-bullshit part of the federal government, in close competition with the Post Office.

Even under The Idiot, they were the ones crying foul when he scribbled on one of their maps.