this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
1523 points (98.5% liked)

People Twitter

5268 readers
656 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
1523
Climate change deniers (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 3 months ago by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
143 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://hachyderm.io/@thomasfuchs/112978866416314024

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

We're already at the point that renewables are far cheaper than the alternatives. It's just the capital costs that are higher (compared to keeping existing FF), but that's not a huge issue for rich, developed countries.

So rich countries can massively invest in renewables and press their advantage. Ideally, these rich countries also subsidise renewable energy in developing countries (and to some extent, they are). But even without that in many cases it's cheaper to just skip building a whole FF industry altogether and go straight to renewables.