this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
64 points (95.7% liked)

collapse of the old society

967 readers
44 users here now

to discuss news and stuff of the old world dying

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I stopped reading at liberalism. It's global capitalism and always has been. Just call it that.

[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Laissez-faire economics is a foundational component of liberalism (well, classical liberalism anyway, which I assume is what he means when using that word).

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Seems naive to think you can really separate the two.

[–] girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Yep. They got the pre-WWII concept right, except they didn't know where to point their finger to blame so they picked liberalism. As usual, it's the populous to blame and not the ones in positions of power.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I do think liberalism carries the blame for being an opiate of the people more powerful and more closely bonded with capitalism than religion ever was. The focus on individual worth and individual freedom has made people way more amicable to being pitted against each other in a capitalist race to the bottom than even 19th/early 20th century conservatism.

Also local capitalism is awful too. Even just one town can have landlords and serfs, merchants and beggars, guildmasters and abused interns.

[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Capitalism favors the individual to self isolate inorder to only pursue monetary value.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago

Yes, and liberalism helps justify that by focusing so heavily on individualist worth and wellbeing. Hence "opiate of the people".