Privacy

31224 readers

977 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

535

Signal Is More Than Encrypted Messaging. Under Meredith Whittaker, It’s Out to Prove Surveillance Capitalism Wrong (www.wired.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by minnix@lemux.minnix.dev to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

274 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/0QgXq

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you don't turn on the secret chat feature it wont be, yes. However if E2EE was the only deciding factor for a gov to go against an App then they woudln't be going after Telegram. The fact that govts are going so hard at telegram simply proves that even when the company has access to all our chats they don't actually provide them to said govts.

I'm not saying telegram is good from a security perspective, I'm just saying that event without E2EE and all the modern wonders govts can't still get in because the company doesn't indulge their requests.