Privacy

31252 readers

818 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

215

The NFL wants to use facial recognition at games. Police say it's a bad idea (www.npr.org)

submitted 2 weeks ago by HailSeitan@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The cops object when their tools on turned on them

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 81 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The AP article for those that don't want to listen: https://apnews.com/article/raiders-nfl-vegas-police-allegiant-stadium-5239b9962c23a6512fa2f694add9b9ea

The highlight for me is this:

The Las Vegas Police Protective Association, with the backing of the department, said they are concerned such technology compromises the officers’ privacy.

It's worth noting they're only doing this for workers, not for attendees. The police would presumably by fine with it if it were just attendees and not workers, because it wouldn't include them.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 55 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok, good. I thought I was the only one who saw this connection. It's not that the police are against facial recog or that they don't want the NFL or anyone else to use it, it's that they're aware of the privacy degradation it causes, and don't want themselves (the police workers of the event) subjected to it. It's fine if we, the attendees, are subjected to it, just not them. Oh, what a world.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yup, cause, once again, fuck the people.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They forget that they are also the people, and all they're doing is helping the corpos gain more power (make no mistake, the governments are a front for the corpos).

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah but they're "special people," not subject to the same rules as the peons, even though they'd be tossed aside for private security should shit go down. God dammit lol

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 4 points 2 weeks ago

"special people" until they're not haha

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Front/right arm/all of one.

I mean we had the Dutch East Indies Corp doing it's thing 300 years ago. It's not really new, and it's frustrating people don't see it.

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The old adage 'why do you care if you've got nothing to hide?' comes to mind