this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
1580 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59211 readers
2519 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 12 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Honestly, copyright is shit. It is created on the basis of an old way of doing things. That is, where big editors and big studios make mass productions of physical copies of a said 'product'. George R. R. Martin , Warner Studios & co are rich. Maybe they have everything to lose without their copy'right' but that isn't the population's problem. We live in an era where everything is digital and easily copiable and we might as well start acting like it.

I don't care if Sam Altman is evil, this discussion is fundamental.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 months ago (8 children)

How did GRRM get rich again?

oh yeah he sold books he worked on for decades, totally the same WB.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br -4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He didn't just sell books, he got signed by editors who published him worldwide. That's what I'm talking about. He was 'chosen' by the market.

[–] redisdead@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can be picked up by every single editor on the planet, if your books are shit you ain't selling them.

People who cry about copyright are either creatively bankrupt or leeches who believe artists shouldn't be paid for their work.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

if your books are shit you ain’t selling them.

Dude, the Twilight series is right there.

[–] redisdead@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They work for a certain audience.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They work for a certain audience.

Yes, people who like shit books. They're still shit books and they still sold fucktons of copies.

[–] redisdead@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

It's a good book for these people. If you think it doesn't take talent to do it, feel free to go for it, and enjoy your easy money.

[–] drislands@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I do not understand what point you're making. Can you elaborate?

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 2 months ago

Yes. I mean that copyright just protects those people that were selected by the industry. I don't mind paying for the artist's work. But I still think it should be DRM free and easily distributable - so people can support the artist if they like the work.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)