this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
35 points (87.2% liked)

World News

32327 readers
515 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

from US perspective there is nothing more that can be achieved there going forward.

There's trillions yet to be funneled to the MIC. I don't know why they'd stop just because they lost another war. The US losing wars is as normal as the sun rising.

[โ€“] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

I think there are physical limits on US power, and we're seeing these limits being reached now. US is simply incapable of producing weapons and ammunition at the rate they're being used in Ukraine. US has now run through much of the existing stocks, and it's operating on very thin margins. I'm sure US will continue to try milk Europe, but NATO isn't strictly necessary for that. Without NATO, Europe is still largely dependent on US, but there won't be a commitment from US. You can think of it the same way NATO is using Ukraine right now, where they provide support, but won't engage Russia directly on Ukraine's behalf. Europe will find itself in the same position in the near future.