this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2104 readers
116 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He also claims that they banned the letter "N" kekw

how can anyone take these people seriously?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] poplargrove@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)

How can pointing out violent supression and the killing of peaceful demonstrators possibly not be informative?

[–] iknt@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

How can pointing out violent supression and the killing of peaceful demonstrators possibly not be informative?

It's not peaceful when PLAs were burnt/killed.

https://archive.ph/CGlJ3

[–] poplargrove@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

While I haven't looked into the two others, on one of the people burnt, Liu Guogeng, it seems important details were excluded:

On the streets, a widely circulated alternative version of events was that Liu had shot four people with his AK47 and was lynched after he ran out of ammunition. In fact, the photos of him hanging from a bus had been framed in such a way as to exclude the slogans scrawled in the dirt on the side of the bus: “He killed four people! Murderer! The People Must Win! Pay Back the Blood Debt!”

From Louisa Lim - The People's Republic of Amnesia, p. 17, just started reading this. It seems curious to me that the sources I have been given are really just repeating the justifications used by the state.

You also completely ignore how when troops were initially sent into stop the protests, the protestors blocked them for days, chatted with and fed, finally forcing the troops to return peacefully. It is the chinese state that began the violent supression of the protests afterwards.

And as I have commented elsewhere, random blogs and Reddit posts are useless sources to learn history from.

[–] iknt@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Here's the more formal source

https://www.qiaocollective.com/education/tiananmenreadinglist

Some more context:

Footage from a documentary titled The Gate of Heavenly Peace shows an interview between Chai Ling (student leader in the Tianamen Square Incident) and reporter Philip Cunningham a week prior to the protest.

In the footage, Chai makes the following statements:

  • Chai Ling: All along I've kept it to myself, because being Chinese I felt I shouldn't bad-mouth the Chinese. But I can't help thinking sometimes – and I might as well say it – you, the Chinese, you are not worth my struggle! You are not worth my sacrifice! What we (the protestors) actually are hoping for is bloodshed, the moment when the government is ready to brazenly butcher the people.

  • Cunningham: "Are you going to stay in the Square yourself?

  • Chai Ling: "No."

  • Cunningham: "Why?"

  • Chai Ling: "Because my situation is different. I want to live. Anyway, that's how I feel about it. I don't know if people will say I'm selfish. I believe that people have to continue the work I have started. A democracy movement can't succeed with only one person. I hope you don't report what I've just said for the time being, okay?"

The footage has been verified by third-party media specialists as genuine, and is readily available online.

Chai Ling, or the biggest hypocritical scumbag ever.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)