Technology

59179 readers

2454 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1594

Some basic info about USB (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by SouravSatvaya@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

272 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 2 months ago (2 children)

USB keeps changing their own standard every 2 years why bother learning it.

[–] 4lan@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Pshh, speak for yourself. I'm ready for USB 3.2 gen 5 pro ultra max

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

But will that be better or worse than USB 3.3 gen 2 extra super speed?

[–] 2xar@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Both, of course.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Will USB 3 get an update now USB4 is out?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Eh, USB4 is basically what USB 3.3 would've been, but with fresh branding. I expect it to have the same naming issues after a few updates...

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't USB4 based on Thunderbolt 3?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Sort of? It borrows a lot of the high speed protocol bits from Thunderbolt 3, but I think it does DP a little differently (at least it supports different DP standards than TB3). So it's closely related, but not necessarily the same thing.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Was that the first one that had M Bison as a playable character?

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

We're not calling it that anymore. It's been rebranded to "SuperDuper Speed USB ]|[" now. Note that this is a different standard than the previous "SuperDuper Speed USB 3," and under no circumstances should you call it "SuperDuper Speed USB 3.0," because there was never any such spec and pedantic nerds will climb up your nose in the comments if you ever utter it.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

And Knuckles

[–] s_s@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, they update the standard to add new things. Is that bad?

[–] Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They also change existing terms for no good reason.

[–] s_s@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The don't.

But give me an example of what you're talking about. I'll explain.

[–] Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

USB3.2 gen 2, USB3.2 Gen2x2

[–] s_s@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The consumer facing names for those transmission specs are and have always been:

SuperSpeed 10 Gbps
SuperSpeed 20 Gbps

Unless you're designing your own circuits you don't need to worry about signaling rates (ie "Gen") or lane configuration (Z×Y).