this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
45 points (77.8% liked)

World News

32076 readers
1085 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sweng@programming.dev -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

that NATO expansion stops. that’s the objective that is being achieved.

Remind me again how many member states NATO had before the invasion, and how many it has now?

[–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Sweden and Finnland, both already being de facto NATO members beforehand... You're not too informed baout this international politic thingy, aren't you?

[–] sweng@programming.dev -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is no such thing as "de facto" NATO member. There are NATO partners, which certainly is not at all the same thing. There was essentially no chance of either country joining NATO as the local support was low. Until Russia invaded Ukraine.

[–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Buddy, if some organisation exists that has members, there will always exist "de facto" members (ones that support the organisation to a large extent, but are not also de jure members), de jure members (members that don't do anything) and both (the rest).

The organisation can make PR about how it has "partners" and the like, but that does not change a thing.

[–] sweng@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago

Why would anyome become the member of anything if you can just be a "de facto" member snd freeload? Why did so many things change, including e.g the signing of DCAs after becoming a member if it somehow does not matter?

NATO does not care too much about non-members, as can be seen by e.g. the non-support for Ukraine. NATO is not a charity. NATO look after itself and its own interests., not the interests of some nebulous "de facto" members that in reality does not exist. This is also why the Finns and Swedes changed their minds about NATO (going from overwhelmingly negative to overwhelmingly positive) so quickly: they realized that being a "de facto" member means nothing. Not even being a NATO partner means much. The only thing that matters is actual membership. Russia managed to show that very clearly, and Finland and Sweden got the message.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

The question is which states, but having no clue regarding the subject you're opining on it's not surprising that you wouldn't understand that. Maybe if you spent your time actually learning things instead of trolling then you'd understand the strategic importance of Ukraine. Maybe go read up on WW2 sometime and see which path the nazis took to Russia then.