this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
54 points (87.5% liked)

PC Gaming

8551 readers
446 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] H4mi@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What is Intel doing? A 12W CPU should not be faster than their 125W flagship. Single core performance is what matters the most in a lot of usage scenarios.

Intel is still on 10nm lithography. Did they stop investing in R&D and machinery a while back? AMD is on 7, Apple on 3.

[–] cryptiod137@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Intel literally spent a decade trying to make there CPUs just a little bit faster, but not too much faster, every year. They succeeded in doing so, and we have this as a result.

The worst part is they aren't eving running at 125w or whatever they claim, often into the 180w or 200w range to reach there own marketing benchmarks.

[–] willya@lemmyf.uk 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You all know that nm are just marketing, and there isn't anything there with literally 3nm

[–] towerful@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago
[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not sure why you getting downvoted, it's true.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago