this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
306 points (99.7% liked)

Electric Vehicles

3121 readers
362 users here now

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Postal Service’s new delivery vehicles aren’t going to win a beauty contest. They’re tall and ungainly. The windshields are vast. Their hoods resemble a duck bill. Their bumpers are enormous.

“You can tell that (the designers) didn’t have appearance in mind,” postal worker Avis Stonum said.

Odd appearance aside, the first handful of Next Generation Delivery Vehicles that rolled onto postal routes in August in Athens are getting rave reviews from letter carriers accustomed to cantankerous older vehicles that lack modern safety features and are prone to breaking down — and even catching fire.

Within a few years of the initial rollout, the fleet will have expanded to 60,000, most of them electric models, serving as the Postal Service’s primary delivery truck from Maine to Hawaii.

Once fully deployed, they’ll represent one of the most visible signs of the agency’s 10-year, $40 billion transformation led by Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, who’s also renovating aging facilities, overhauling the processing and transportation network, and instituting other changes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The president can't directly fire him, and inexplicably hasn't used the indirect means available (appointing new members to the board of governors who would do the needful).

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Biden used his direct power to cancel student debt for a lot of borrowers and the Supreme Court illegally blocked it so laws are meaningless in this country.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Basically the governors on the board like him, the senate will fight any appointments, and Biden cowed him over the electrical vehicles already, so it was largely a win, somewhat a loss as is.

Initially the new vehicles were going to be like 90% gas, 10% electric. Biden forced him to flip to almost all electric.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’ll be blunt: the EV win is going to be categorically meaningless if DeJoy ends up fucking with mail in ballots enough that it makes an impact on the result of the election

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It's a small win orthogonal to that.

[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks, this is super useful context. I was also scratching my head how something broadly positive was coming out of De Joy, who has certainly worked to dismantle USPS from what I remember.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

It's in spite of him, not from him.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well actually, now he can. “Official act, fuck you.” (per Trump v. United States, No. 23-939)

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But only if he assassinates him, right?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, yeah, that’s one way to “fire” someone.

Also: is an assassination if it’s an “official act”?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Why wouldn't it be?