this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
41 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16742 readers
705 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
41
Grasshopper CEO Suda51 says people ‘care too much’ about Metacritic scores (www.videogameschronicle.com)
submitted 2 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Suda suggested that one reason is publishers and developers focusing too much on Metacritic scores, and deciding to play it safe and stick to what is conventionally known to ‘work’ instead of taking risks with new ideas.

I think most people are missing that they're talking about them from a dev and publisher standpoint, not consumer / gamer.

And from that perspective it is problematic whenever things that are supposed to be used to assess something become targets to shoot for. Oscar bait, teachers teaching the test and not the subject, etc.

[–] explodes@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

They're well informed lemmings who read the title only.

But for the topic at hand, it seems that it's similar to how the movie industry operates. When hundreds of millions can be on the line, a sure bet is better than a risky bet.

[–] shani66@ani.social 1 points 2 months ago

Although from a consumer standpoint it's true a well. Official reviewers are often bought (directly or not), pressured in other ways, operate on nonsense scales, and are infamously not actually that good at video games. Player reviews are a Little better, but you have to be adept at weeding out whinging from people who suck at games or just suck broadly.

Streamers/YouTubers are the only real option, imo, as they actually show what they're doing (no lying!) and have to build up an actual reputation of some kind to be noticed.