this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
391 points (92.6% liked)

Technology

58115 readers
4071 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

World’s first ‘superfast’ battery offers 400km range from 10 mins charge::Tesla, Toyota and VW supplier CATL says production will begin in 2023

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (45 children)

Which is great. No need to poo poo it.

However. Fast charge isn't really necessary unless you are on a long journey over 400 km and need to charge on route or you drive a lot. Eg taxi Uber etc.

Best thing ever industry can do for planet would be a 350km car that's cheap. That's really what most car users require. They drive to and from work and most drive less than 100km a day.

Just like a phone you charge over night and don't need oooodles of range.

Anyone going on long trips really should be using a train with another vehicle if required at the destination.

Truckers are a different story and should be separated from the day to days if average car users

[–] crossover@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Charging at work via solar would be even better. If there was some way for businesses to be incentivised for it.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'd be curious just how much energy you'd get from this. I couldn't imagine it would be very much. If the solar panels are on the roof and the roof is at least translucent then the efficiency would go way down. Not that i think an opaque roof would do a whole lot better though.

[–] outplayed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think he means on the car roof but rather over the parking lot/work building

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, my. Lol. I really misunderstood

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (41 replies)