this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
23 points (96.0% liked)

Interesting Shares

816 readers
56 users here now

Companion community of !globalnews@lemmy.zip to share interesting articles, projects and research that doesn't fit the definition of news.

Icon attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The state is grappling with the legacy of a surgeon who allegedly mutilated an Aboriginal man's remains.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They should leave the status where they are. If you replace it you are just encouraging more vandalism. If you want to honor other less recognized historical figures you should build new statues.

I don't like the school of thought of some of these people. They advocate burying out history instead of addressing the past. Just because your past is dark doesn't mean it should be forgotten. If it is dark you should address it more as it needs to be talked about.

As far a statue go you could add an additional plaque explaining the history and then build a newer status nearby that honors a hero who was on the side of the victims. Statues are a part of the history and they deserve to be left alone. Destroying art because it doesn't align with the current politics creates long term regret.