this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
881 points (89.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

5726 readers
1513 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm ok with them chasing ethical applications of AI. I'm more tired of their half-assed efforts to chase every shiny new object over the last few years. It feels like as a non-profit, they should be comparatively immune to chasing the same transitory trends that other shareholder-owned companies are obsessed over. But it seems like for Mozilla, they have an even shorter attention span than their corporate competitors. We've seen them chase after crypto, metaverse, augmented reality, Firefox OS, and now AI. All of those efforts fizzled out with a whimper.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That crypto one isn't even a project, just that they used some service to handle crypto donations for them. It is weird though that they think they can just walk into a successful space without offering anything new and still expect to get users.

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

It's a shame FirefoxOS didn't gain enough traction.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure, but the only way to counter AI spam in the dead internet might be to have your own local AI model to filter junk out. And that has to be with the browser.

There is also cookie consent spam, ads and newspaper "notify me" shit that probably can only be fixed with AI.

Your take is that Mozilla doesn't think before they adopt, except people here don't think about what not to adopt either.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Thinking before they adopt is hard to do. I understand some experiments get cut. But I'm not sure they are thinking even after they adopt. Thus the half-assed delivery and constantly abandoning projects before they get a fair shake