this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)

Bicycling

2121 readers
39 users here now

A community for those who enjoy bicycling for any reason— utility, recreation, sport, or whatever!

Post your questions, experiences, knowledge, pictures, news, links, and (civil) rants.

Rules (to be added on an as-needed basis)

  1. Comments and posts should be respectful and productive.
  2. No ads or commercial spam, including linking to your own monetized content.
  3. Linked content should be as unburdened by ads and trackers as possible.

Welcome!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I was always wondering this. Imagine a steep descent. What is better for brake wear - braking constantly or more powerful just at the end? Anybody knows? Goes for both rim and disc brakes

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mihies@programming.dev 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Wind resistance makes total sense. I'm not entirely sure on short bursts, though. I mean you have to change the fixed amount of kinetic energy to heat in fixed time. Theoretically both would result is similar temperature given short time span.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Short bursts heat up your pads quickly, but allow them to cool back down in between.
Continuous braking keeps the heat on.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Hm, yes, but total amount of heat is constant. Perhaps it cools quicker with bursts and its higher temperatures because of difference in temperature against ambient.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Not all the heat goes into your brake pads. Your rims or discs take much of the heat but also cool down very fast.