this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
127 points (81.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43895 readers
1381 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Might wanna practice reading more carefully. I just said they are two separate and unrelated things. And here you are acting like I said they are one and the same and in a homophobic way or something. Bizarre.

[โ€“] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think it's forbidden knowledge that a large portion of furries are LGBT. Don't know why you're calling them unrelated.

[โ€“] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At no point did I say anything insulting. Claiming that two groups aren't one and the same isn't hateful, and it's frankly weird you're trying to twist my words into that. Whoever hurt you is not me.

[โ€“] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Claiming that two groups aren't one and the same isn't hateful,

Kinda is though. Trying to remove the LGBT aspect from a group largely consisting of LGBT.

[โ€“] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is so dumb. Please leave me alone

[โ€“] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

separate and unrelated

P(Person is queer | Person is furry) > P(Person is queer), therefore these are not separate and unrelated

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditional_probability#Statistical_independence

[โ€“] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So because I am white and a male, I guess you can't say anything about what it means to be male without that applying to white women too? Do you actually speak English or what?

[โ€“] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have no clue what you're trying to say. How many women are men?

Exactly zero, because (excluding certain trans identities for the purpose of simplification) there is no intersection between the two groups. Talking about what it means to be a men doesn't involve a single woman, therefore it doesn't apply to them.

Hating a primarily queer subgroup has very much homophobic implications, the same way the war on drugs is obviously racist:

We knew we couldnโ€™t make it illegal to be either against the war or Black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and Blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities

  • A certain honest man
[โ€“] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The analogy was straightforward. My whiteness apparently makes me the same as every other white person. You're trying to find something that isn't here, at all

[โ€“] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"I don't hate group ABC. I just hate group XYZ that happens to be almost solely composed of members of ABC."

Next you will be arguing why hating blues, jazz and rap with every fibre of your being isn't racist.

And to further show why your analogy doesn't work:

P(Person being white | Person being male) = P(Person being white).

Being white and being male is unrelated and separate (<=> statistically independent), unlike being a furry and being queer which is actually related as mentioned earlier.