this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
928 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3094 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is a patent lawsuit, not copyright

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

even worse. software patents are just more idiotic copyrights.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Might be about a design patent

[–] leopold@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dunno, I think I prefer patents. Unlike copyright, patents usually last a flat twenty years. Copyright expires either after 95 years or 70 years after the death of the author, which is ludicrous. Both are constantly abused, but at least patents expire in a reasonable amount of time.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

patents and copyright are pretty different though. IMO both are bad but you can at least make a case for protecting intelectual work from copying. Patents protect replication of ideas and ideas don't have to be unique at all. If I say it was my idea to call variables a,b,c,d,e in that order that means anyone who wants to do that in their creations needs my permission which is fucking bonkers.

I'm convinced that software patents exist purely for regulatory capture.