this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
519 points (96.6% liked)

linuxmemes

20829 readers
1159 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Did they invent X11 Forwarding over the network?

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Btw. when we get wayland forwarding over Network?

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

waypipe exists, but it's still not perfect.

Neither was X11 so it's in good company

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

Never heard about this. Thx.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Btw. when we get wayland ~~forwarding over Network~~?

/c/foundthenvidiauser

[–] d_k_bo@feddit.org 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unlike X11, Wayland was never intended to be network transparent. As others say, solutions like waypipe and more tradionally RDP and VNC exist.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Exactly. We won’t. We’ll get specialized video stream over network. I’m not happy about this regression. I understand that was a willing sacrifice to achieve better local performance, but I’m not sure it was worth it.

[–] MinFapper@startrek.website 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Their reasoning was that X11 network transparency had been broken for quite some time. If you tried running chrome, most games, or anything with modern hardware acceleration over X11 forwarding, they wouldn't work.

So, IMHO waypipe is actually an improvement in terms of compatibility, rather than a regression.

You always had the option to send frames over the net using VNC and such. But for many use cases, X over SSH was absolutely fantastic.

I remember using it on a very basic DSL connection to work remotely back in 2005, and it was almost like running local. You don’t get anywhere near the same performance with VNC or RDP.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s more about security if I recall correctly

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How so? Is there a way for malicious code to start injecting itself into calls to 127.0.0.1?

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Sorry, I am not an expert myself, but I think there are some recourses about that in the internet

Or, this file on x.org:

“But the X protocol is still unsecure by design…”

https://www.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2014/XDC2014DodierPeresSecurity/xorg-talk.pdf

Yeah, to send it naked over the wire would be nuts, which is why everybody uses SSH. But unless there’s insecurity within the computer, that’s a moot point.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

X11 can render individual windows (Xclients) through the network on another Xserver since decades. With XPRA you can even buffer them, to move them from one Xserver to another or make sure they survive network disconnect. It's very cool, but not widely used.

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, the ssh -X flag forwards it.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I doubt it's nearly as secure as OpenSSH though.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

it goes through an SSH tunnel