this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
264 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

58152 readers
3776 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, and I use Tuta. Those are outliers, the vast majority use gmail, or at least the vast majority in my circles do.

It's the same thing as the network effect, just a little less ubiquitous, people will tend to use whatever everyone else uses. Getting something new like email (SMTP) is a huge endeavor, it's a lot easier to just build a centralized service and get people to use that, and most people will use the same provider anyway.

I don't like it, but I understand why it works and is so common.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Those are outliers

...I don't understand your point. Do outliers make it not decentralized?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

No, those being outliers means the email argument isn't particularly strong, especially when talking about a new standard. If most people use a single service anyway, why would a company go out of its way to make something decentralized? And for something like encrypted chat, that's a lot of extra work.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If most people use a single service anyway, why would a company go out of its way to make something decentralized?

Same reason they did it for email?

What, by starting as a government system using a completely different protocol, then adapting to always-online network connections (i.e. universities) at a time when spam didn't really exist?

The 70s and 80s were a very different time, and regular consumers didn't use email until it had gone through several iterations. Even so, most people used a single implementation (sendmail on BSD) for quite some time before anyone else got involved.

The internet today is a very different beast, you can either try for an open standard, or you can try for user acquisition. Almost nobody seriously goes for the open standard anymore, unless it's an iteration of an already existing open standard.