I appreciate that you started off your post with the stupidest possible thing you could say so that everybody knows they don't need to waste time reading the rest.

[–] _cnt0@lemmy.villa-straylight.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You might want to look up the term neo-Nazi and learn why there is a distinction between it and the term Nazi. Your display of ignorance is indicative of that you really should read my "post" (it's a comment) in its entirety.

[–] bear@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nazi colloquially includes neonazi. You're being incredibly weird about this.

[–] _cnt0@lemmy.villa-straylight.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You seem to be part of the people who weirdly rationalize dehumanizing humans and on top of that water down language beyond usability.

[–] bear@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't dehumanize anybody. I just correctly recognize the threat that bigotry poses to society, especially if allowed to grow and gain power. That threat is very much human and we can never allow ourselves to forget that. Evil tends to be very banal.

[–] _cnt0@lemmy.villa-straylight.social 1 points 1 year ago

I don't dehumanize anybody.

In this thread you seem to be, because I'm the only party criticizing it. And if you had read what I wrote that should be pretty clear to you.

I just correctly recognize the threat that bigotry poses to society, especially if allowed to grow and gain power.

Not in this thread. Maybe you generally do, but I don't see any shred of elaboration on that here.

That threat is very much human and we can never allow ourselves to forget that.

Like dehumanizing is a very (negative) human trait. Which I layed out and critisized in detail in my comment you opted not to read after the first line.

Evil tends to be very banal.

As in "Nazis are not humans" or "violence against Nazis is OK"? Spoiler alert: That's dehumanization in action. And that's what I'm criticizing.