this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
101 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

59758 readers
2849 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (7 children)

I had no idea waiting could be ‘tenacious’.

[–] lechatron 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Sounds like all she did was toss it in a drawer for 10 years, so very tenacious of her.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, I was expecting it to be something like "0000, no. 0001, no. 0002, no... Holy crap, I got it!"

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I did this with a suitcase lock once, luckily only 3 digits. The code was 587. I remembered the code at around 540.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, four digits probably wouldn't take 10 years. Eight digits, I could see depending on how fast you're allowed to try again. I was just being lazy about typing.

[–] Aethr@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

It would if the lockout time got longer with every failed attempt

[–] lechatron 5 points 2 months ago

Exactly what I thought too.

load more comments (5 replies)