UK Politics

3036 readers

128 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

[The Spectator] Why is Labour so puritanical? (www.spectator.co.uk)

submitted 5 days ago by steeznson@lemmy.world to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is spectator so they are taking the most extreme right wing viewpoint on Labour's recent policies to improve the nation's health. I disagree with how they characterise it for the most part but they do seem to put their finger on the kind of authoritarian impulses inside the party. Definitely think the author misses the mark with their badly thought out/unsupported angle about it being patronising class politics.

I was too young to take in much when John Major was in power but remember New Labour with Blair/Brown very well. They were also keen to make similar kind of policies that were - for lack of a better phrase - nanny state-ish. I found it interesting thinking about that legacy.

Should also mention that both parties tend towards these types of policies. I suspect the civil service are keen on them and they test well in focus groups.

Article is paywalled so will post it in comments.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] frazorth@feddit.uk 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That’s high in calories.

What? Who introduced the Soft Drink levy?

You can’t say that anymore.

What are they wanting to say, that they feel they can't?

You’ve used the wrong pronoun.

Oh, here we go.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yep that's what the spectator is like. I still think their general point is interesting.

[–] frazorth@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That Labour needs a Farage like face at the front to make it "fun", or are you thinking more Ed Davey?

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Personally? I'm a Lib Dem member but I care about civil liberties a lot. Probably obligated to say Ed Davey but he's a bit too wet for me.

[–] frazorth@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The only reason I mention Frarage was the rest of the language in that piece was a bit off.

Ed Davey is alright, he is fun yet also completely sincere.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah the spectator are probably the most right-wing publication in the UK with wide readership. They have a lot of edgy columnists like this dude. They are probably somewhere between the tories and reform in terms of the right wing scale.

Edit: My boomer parents actually got me a subscription to it for a year, a few years back as a birthday present. I'd say like half of the political coverage was palletable and pretty good on the whole; half was swivel-eyed right wing garbage. The arts coverage was susprisingly good.