this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
837 points (99.6% liked)

Privacy

32103 readers
596 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah I don't understand why they don't have a codeberg or similar that they host themselves.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How would that help? If you release something as GPL code, you cannot prevent it from being used to train a model, no matter where it's hosted.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

There's a difference between handing something to someone and leaving it somewhere they happen to be able to take it from.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Im personally waiting for a massive lawsuit, legally companies cannot train AI on GPL code (at least I don't believe so)

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There's nothing in GPL that would forbid it. Only distribution without code publication is forbidden.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

mhm, and how would the distribution inside an LLM work? Are those code snippets CoPilot et al produce come with dedicated license sections?

And regarding how it would help selfhosting the code: it wouldn't be on the GITHub servers owned by Microsoft, which owns/operates CoPilot. Its akin to feeding the LLM directly by pushing it to their servers.

If Al warned about that it would be legal, I don't believe any AI requires GPL