this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
437 points (98.4% liked)

PC Gaming

8293 readers
1232 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 131 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It's funny because if Bethesda, EA, Ubisoft and Epic joined forces to make one platform they could put a dent in the steam monopoly.

But since they're bunch of shittiy toxic managers with mentality of screwing everyone around for their own benefit, it's never going to happen. They will always fail and crawl back to Gabe

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Homie, motherfucking Microsoft couldn't put a dent in STEAM.

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Please Microsoft couldn't even maintain Skype dominance after they bought it.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair they bought skype to break it's end to end encryption at the behest of the us govt. In return they were awarded big contracts.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/11/microsoft-nsa-collaboration-user-data

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 3 points 22 hours ago

True, they ended P2P networking and proper encryption. It was pretty obvious in the context of Prysm scandal

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

And they killed MSN for it.

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (3 children)

For a short period, yes probably. But Bethesda is a failing studio and so is Ubisoft. EA has popular sports games but I’d guess that’s a very small portion of PC sales considering those games do poorly on the platform compared to consoles. Epic does have loads of money but not enough to float the other companies.

In my view, Microsoft and their GamePass stuff is the only real competitor that will ever take a small dent out of steams sales, mostly because of the Call of Duty titles being on there now. But in order to take 0.05% or whatever of their sales they had to: own the OS for almost every computer running steam, buy dozens of game studios, compete (and lose) in the physical console market over decades, and they had to buy not one but two of the largest studios out there. To the point where they own a significant portion of the iOS App Store that is orders of magnitude more money than PC games and still they cannot compete with steam on their own operating system.

If that doesn’t spell out how unstoppable Steam is, I don’t know what will. The thing that might actually hurt Steam is if those publishers were all GamePass exclusives. Even then, Steam would be just fine I think. Crazy.

[–] greenskye@lemm.ee 36 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Steam is untouchable until Gaben dies. Then God help us all.

[–] nieceandtows@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

His plan is to rise after the third day

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 2 points 22 hours ago

And on that third day, he releases all the 3 games that they've been withholding. He will be risen, Gaben.

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I hope he'll turn Steam into non-profit before he dies...

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago

Non profits can still be super corrupt, especially in the US as they don't have to disclose any money flow so a huge percent of the time it goes to the board of directors.

See: Susan B kohlman

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Trust in Lord Gaben

[–] 50MYT@aussie.zone 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The only thing to hurt steam will be Gabe dying

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m more optimistic about that. I don’t see why the storefront or their general philosophy would change. At least not quickly. What might change is how they treat their IP. Ask yourself if you’d be okay with another half life game being just a 7/10 game. Because I think that’s what would happen.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A 7/10 game would be better then no game. Besides sequels don't erase the original.

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

That’s kind of why I said ask yourself. Because I think some of their titles Id rather see live on at a 7/10 level but others I don’t think need it. Like I could handle a TF3 at that level or maybe even a portal game. But half life would kind of hurt to see it not be a 10/10 maximum effort game. I wish they’d finish the story while Gabe is still at the company.

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 10 points 2 days ago

Steam does good by the customer. No one else does. Only when they are customer first will they make a dent in Steam sales.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Its literally the prisoners dilemma but they're too greedy to look at it factually 😭

Explanation for those that don't know https://youtu.be/TJCGTNIwmv8?si=lRAX3BPpKO2j_SOX

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

You left your SI in the link

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

~~Bethesda~~ Microsoft, EA, Ubisoft and Epic