this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
65 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

19 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 1 year ago
 

A federal judge on Friday upheld a finding from the U.S. Copyright Office that a piece of art created by AI is not open to protection.

"In March, the copyright office affirmed that most works generated by AI aren’t copyrightable but clarified that AI-assisted materials qualify for protection in certain instances. An application for a work created with the help of AI can support a copyright claim if a human “selected or arranged” it in a “sufficiently creative way that the resulting work constitutes an original work of authorship,” it said."

Thaler was appealing this, and his appeal was denied.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ragnell@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, computer forensics IS a thing. Computers keep a record of everything done on them, and if it comes down to a lot of money at stake and a lawsuit then those computers can be looked at.

[–] gullible@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What, a full department equivalent to the IRS to constantly audit art and its process? That could work. It’d be pricy, but it could work.

[–] Ragnell@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

It would create jobs.