this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
113 points (99.1% liked)

Solarpunk technology

2310 readers
148 users here now

Technology for a Solar-Punk future.

Airships and hydroponic farms...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 9 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Yet, some landlords refused it. There have been talks about a new regulation, but currently a landlord can more or less arbitrarily deny solar panels.

My "landlord" is a company owned 100% by the city I live in, they claim to embrace solar, but in order to get the permit to install a panel I need a structural review of the balcony, which a) costs a ton of money and b) I need some documentation (blueprints/plan) from my landlord. So far that sounds kind of reasonable, buuuut they refuse to give out any information about their buildings, so even if I would pay someone to prove the balcony won't collapse, this guy can't finish the report without knowing what the wall is made of.

So effectively, they managed to pull ye olde Kafka not-really-denial.

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

If you are talking about Germany, that is no longer true - landlords can not deny installations without sound reason:

https://www.tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/verbraucher/balkonkraftwerke-mieter-gesetzesaenderung-100.html

The surrounding laws were updated July this year, so it is a recent change.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If your balcony collapses due to 800W worth of solar it'd also collapse due to a couple of planters or a fat friend coming over so I guess you should take such worries as an admission on their part and withhold rent until they prove that the balcony is safe to use.

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I think you might have replied to the wrong comment.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

Yes and no, I think withholding rent is a quite German thing (or, rather, courts siding with you when you do it) and "it's not structurally sound" sounds like a thing rabidly anti-solar landlords would come up with to get around the law.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

typical hehe
governments are often more strict in rules than normal people, and those rules often prevent other rules from being enforced hehe
it shouldnt be though, they should set the bar with their own buildings :)