this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
-4 points (33.3% liked)
Skeptic
1293 readers
1 users here now
A community for Scientific Skepticism:
Scientific skepticism or rational skepticism, sometimes referred to as skeptical inquiry, is a position in which one questions the veracity of claims lacking empirical evidence.
Do not confuse this with General Skepticism, Philosophical Skepticism, or Denialism.
Things we like:
- Civility
- Thoughtful discussion based on evidence and facts
- Humor
Things we don't like:
- Personal attacks or disrespectful attitude
- Wild speculation on events with no evidence
- Low-effort comments and posts
Other communities of interest:
"A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." -David Hume
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Do you also argue that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is a democratic republic? Was the German National Socialist Worker's party actually a socialist worker's party?
Or do maybe sometimes people not use the literal meaning of things even if they are capable of thinking critically?
In fact, I would suggest that the critical way to think about this is to accept that sometimes people use terms to mean things other than their literal meaning.
Actually, the critical way to think about this is to keep the subject on UFOs not to change it. That is why the name has been changed from UFO to UAP.
Sorry, you can't police people's language. That's not how language works.
I'm not policing it. I'm saying it's wrong. I can do that and I did do that. If you think that's policing, I don't have any idea what to tell you.
Okay, well enjoy experiencing people constantly getting it wrong because there's likely nothing you'll ever be able to do about it.
Personally, I'm not a fan of the way most people use "infamous," but I've come to accept it.