this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
313 points (93.6% liked)

Funny

6827 readers
391 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"somebody is fucking with me"

The Earth is way too close, and I don't think a meteor strike on the earth, no matter how energetic, would look like a bullet going through an apple.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You assume this is a meteor strike and not some type of planet killing weapon

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

That's no moon.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Kinetic kill vehicle.

[–] remi_pan@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe a piece of very dense matter (neutronium ?), at very high speed (relativistic) could do that ?

[–] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think any matter going fast enough would do that. In the fast going thing's perspective the earth would basically be just a thin membrane.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah but the projectile itself would also liquefy. Maybe if it was something super dense.

[–] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

that's basically chemistry. At relativistic speeds the electrons of the projectile don't have play a significant role. It's going to be atomic nuclei hitting atomic nuclei and the time it takes to go through the earth is like two microseconds for the projectile going at ( 1 - 10^-9 ) c. Even that, I suppose, is too long for the particle beam to scatter momentum from fusing with other particles, creating gamma rays, creating exotic particles etc. But we could just always go even closer to c? (on paper)