this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
51 points (85.9% liked)

Programming

17432 readers
212 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (13 children)

OOP is great, and can be much simpler than what you've seen.

It's Java culture that's terrible. The word "Factory" is a code smell all on its own.

Just like any tool, don't overuse it. Don't force extra layers of abstraction.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I've realized that Factories are actually kind of fine, in particular when contexualized as being the equivalent of partials from the world of functionals.

[–] Kache@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

IMO factory functions are totally fine -- I hesitate to even give them a special name b/c functions that can return an object are not special.

However I think good use cases for Factory classes (and long-lived stateful instances of) are scarce, often being better served using other constructs.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)