this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
116 points (98.3% liked)
Not The Onion
12541 readers
643 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wouldn't that be entrapment though?
To add more detail to the other reply, it's only entrapment if they coerce you into doing something you wouldn't have otherwise done.
A cop comes up to you and goes 'bro, lets go steal that car!' would probably be entrapment.
Cops putting a car on a street waiting for someone to steal it wouldn't be.
But this would be like a car that has the keys in the ignition and a sign making you aware of that fact.
Even that wouldn't be entrapment
I mean, that's basically what a trap car is, and those have been litigated to the point it's very clear that it's not entrapment and totally allowed.
I mean you have to be kind of stupid to see an expensive car sitting there with the keys in the ignition and go 'BRO! New ride!', but 'stupid' isn't a criminal defense (so far anyways) and nobody MAKES them get in the car, start it, and drive off.
Thats the point. A stand up citizen wouldnt even care. they may notice a easily stealable item but will just walk by.
no, because they only provided the opportunity
Generally not. Entrapment is very specific, and leaving you the option of doing something illegal without pushing you to do it is decidedly not entrapment.