Games

16936 readers

374 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

311

CD Projekt boss pushes back on 'conspiracy theories' against diversity in gaming: 'We live in times where anyone can record complete nonsense and make a story out of it' (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 2 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/games@sh.itjust.works

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

CD Projekt joint CEO Michał Nowakowski has issued a strongly worded response to accusations that the studio "is in a lot of trouble right now" because of "diversity hires," saying the people peddling such nonsense need to "stop looking for conspiracy theories."

"Seems we live in times where anyone can record complete nonsense and make a story out of it," Nowakowski said in response to a post on X by YouTuber Endymion, who has a long history of stridently complaining about diversity and "wokeness" in videogames.

"CDPR talent leaving? We have the lowest rotation of people in recent years. DEI-driven recruitment? We hire based on merit and talent alone, just as we make games driven by artistic vision alone. Why did we choose [Unreal Engine]? Because it enables us to work on our games more efficiently and we remain cutting edge tech-wise. The Witcher 3’s director left? Well, yeah, more than 2 years ago… Now, can we stop looking for conspiracy theories and go back to making cool stuff?"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Eggyhead@fedia.io 33 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If nobody plays defense, they blindly assume they’re right about everything. That’s about it. Like children without an adult to tell them off when they act fussy over nothing.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think the point is they either assume themselves to be right because no one argued, or because everyone who argued is brainwashed woke-zombie.

So if the result is the same, it may be wiser to skip the arguing part ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Depends what your goal is.

If you are trying to change that persons actions specifically, it likely is a lose lose, because they will make more of the same content about the response.

The goal here isnt to actually stop the youtuber from doing anything. The goal is to offer a different firsthand perspective from inside the company, and I think this message does that.

Now anyone that hears about the initial YouTube video, will also hear about the response, and the average person is likely to believe the studios version over a youtuber.

I think saying nothing would distance the company from its fans to some degree, and putting out some PR spin would backfire immediately.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

I think that if replies are rare and spot on, it may be a good PR. But do it every time and it will just be a waste of time without any good results

[–] omarfw@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They'll do that anyway. They engage only in ideological proclamation, not critical analysis. They think truth is dictated by consensus.

You deal with these people by disenfranchising them and removing their opportunities to gain power, not by engaging them directly in debate. Never engage with an echo chamber if you don't want the ideology of that echo chamber to infect others like a virus.