PC Gaming

8576 readers

213 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

212

CD Projekt boss pushes back on 'conspiracy theories' against diversity in gaming: 'We live in times where anyone can record complete nonsense and make a story out of it' (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 1 month ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

59 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

...as a lazy and simple answer, so you can put the blame for society’s problems on other people, and take no responsibility for learning and growing as people yourselves?

It's bad because, exactly as you have displayed, people will hyper focus on trigger words, while ignoring everything else that gets said.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, but your original comment was pretty much a non-sequitor.

Saying that it's bad to say that those groups of people are bad doesn't mean that anyone is saying that those groups of people are good as a simple answer. But frankly, saying those groups are good is probably a better answer than saying they're bad.

We have homophobes, misogynists, and ableists, so there are definitely people who explicitly think those groups are bad.

Meanwhile, the people advocating for the rights of those groups are not saying that all people in those groups are virtuous and can do no wrong... they're advocating for equal rights and opportunities.

Besides. I'm fine with "women are good" being the starting point rather than "women are bad"...lol

[–] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's only a non-sequitur if you hyperfixate on the part inside quotes while ignoring the central thrust: That attempting to reduce large populations down to simple catch phrases will never end well in the long run. Too many people argue fervently over how we should label broad segments of society, to the point that they attack anyone suggesting that they shouldn't be doing that by assuming those people must just want the opposite, but equally reductive, perspective to be true.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

As I recall, the comment you replied to said that we shouldn't label broad segments of the population in a certain way. Then you said we shouldn't label broad segments of the population in a different way.

As I mentioned, homophobia, misogyny, and ableism are all well-documented phenomenon. The original comment suggested those things are bad. Since they involve labeling broad strokes of the population as bad (specifically, gay people, women, and people with disabilities), I take it you're opposed to those things?