this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
79 points (95.4% liked)

Gaming

20015 readers
679 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

If GOG are such a freedom heroes why do they rely on megacorp Windows OS? That's what I like about steam - it makes gaming on linux dumb easy. And not just on linux, their "package" is ridiculously good - mods, cummunity, reviews, friends, non stop sales, mobile app (although I hate they removed chat to standalone app), and much, much more.

I'm not shitting on GOG. I love those guys, they brought back so much memories with reviving long forgotten games, I have hundreds of purchases there. But... it just needs a lite more polish (pun intended).

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago

Yeah. I intentionally buy my games on Steam for ethical reasons because Valve contributes to a positive gaming ecosystem by making things run seamlessly on Linux.

GOG contributes to a negative gaming ecosystem by making Windows the "easy" option and not making use of Proton (or similar tech). Hopefully they fix that one day, but they don't seem to care.

[–] exu@feditown.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They really should deliver on their promise of making a Linux client.

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Not sire how it's now, but couple years ago that "new galaxy" thing felt like it was precisely crafted to NOT run on linux. I tried multiple ways to run it, but all of them were unstable, crashing and very laggy. The best one was through Bottles but still... Heroic came and was instantly way ahead.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'd take a guess that from their perspective, putting that time + money into developing and supporting a Linux version isn't worth it when probably ~3% of the user base is using it.