this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
45 points (82.6% liked)

Opensource

1524 readers
82 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I gave him credit for that while also saying we shouldn't platform him or give him attention until and unless he recants and / or apologizes. Just like the report says.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

recants and / or apologizes

Just curious what, precisely, you would expect him to recant or apologise for?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

See the report and take your pick.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

From what? I'm not sure what in the report you think needs apologising for. Did you actually read the report? Is there a sentence you can quote and say "he needs to apologise for this"?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I believe you're arguing in bad faith because the report makes it obvious what objectionable statements were made. Bye!

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

the report makes it obvious what objectionable statements were made

I disagree. The report claims there are disagreeable statements but when you actually look at the quotes of what Stallman said, they don't match the claims or conclusions of the report.

This is why I'm asking if you can actually quote something Stallman said.

I believe you're arguing in bad faith

I don't think you've actually read the report.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago

I skimmed the first handful of alleged harmful statements on two topics before deciding I wouldn't benefit from reading the whole thing.