Technology

60087 readers

2512 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

597

Lots of PCs are poised to fall off the Windows 10 update cliff one year from today (arstechnica.com)

submitted 2 months ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world

276 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tomatoely@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

When an app supports linux, it can do so by either:

packaging it for popular distro repositories,
giving instructions on how to build the app from the source code

package it on distro-agnostic, package management solutions like flatpak or appImage.

These last ones are sandboxed environments. That means they have their own dependencies isolated from your system, so they dont have to deal with every distros pecularities at the cost of using more storage space. This is very useful for developers and in your case benefitial for the user because you can have both steam and zoom via flatpak on mint, arch or any obscure distro that has flatpak available, without any major problems.

Edit: Formatting

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yup. The big downside to flatpak is that, as you said, it takes up more space.

To make a Windows comparison, imagine needing to install Java separately for every single program that needs it. Flatpaks tend to be orders of magnitude larger than technically necessary, simply because they’re sandboxed and come with everything they need to run, even if you already have it installed.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago

imagine needing to install Java separately for every single program that needs it

Isn't that pretty close to what already happens though? With all of the different versions of java, different companies packaging up their special versions of OpenJDK, I've got quite a few different java versions on my computer plus I'm pretty sure I've seen some software just package their own Java binary with the software presumably to limit Java version mismatches