Philosophy

1770 readers

1 users here now

All about Philosophy.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

SnowC0de@lemmy.ml

Inconsistent Internal Logic (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 month ago by sneekee_snek_17@lemmy.world to c/philosophy@lemmy.ml

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Thesis My personal moral philosophy is a garbled mess.

Premise 1 I am, as any college student who has taken one or two philosophy classes is, a dyed-in-the-wool utilitarian.

Premise 2 When my wife is annoyed by something I did, or forgot to do, I invariably argue that my motives were pure and, thus, should be free of blame.

Conclusion Premise 1 posits that I adhere to a utilitarian ethical framework. Premise 2 posits that I argue against being blamed for my actions from a deontological perspective. Thus, I am a wishy-washy yahoo who uses whichever moral philosophy is convenient at the moment; QED.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Anyway my go-to response of course is “why how many do most people have” then offer to freshen their drink.

IMO it is worth being proud of the times you realized you were wrong. Most people live unexamined or underexamined lives. Having fewer moments when you realized you were wrong is not even remotely close to having been wrong fewer times. If anything it indicates the opposite: those with fewer wrongness-realizations will continue to be wrong in myriad subtle and humorously obvious ways.

I love this response because it might make the other person realize they have no clue how often they're wrong.