Technology

59422 readers

3035 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

216

TV that doesn't require 'on-line activation' to set up. (midwest.social)

submitted 1 month ago by catfishsushi@midwest.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

77 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm going to buy my first new TV in years. Even if it's a 'smart' tv we plan to just use our Roku. I've heard that some TVs require you to connect it to the internet before you can even use a Roku device. For privacy reasons I don't want my TV to EVER have access to my wifi. Is anyone aware of how to know what models/brands of TVs allow me to use it without ever connecting the TV itself to wifi?

If necessary I guess I could connect it to my guest network to 'activate' the TV, set up the Roku to connect to my private network, then change the password to the guest network.

Would rather just have a TV that doesn't even 'phone home' once.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Alternative perspective: Buy the most intrusive, ad-subsidized set you can find and disconnect/block it so you get all of the benefit and none of the privacy invasion?

[–] quixotic120@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ensure it works offline before buying would be my only advice here. Also don’t be surprised if it still has ads, I know android tv can have ads without connecting to the internet because it’ll have them cached from a fresh install. Adblocking on android tv is a pain because the caching of ad content can make you think it’s not working

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ugh. This is why we can’t have nice things.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You can, they just cost more.

[–] quixotic120@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

This isn’t really true, they don’t write a separate os for the fancier TVs. The $5000 83” oled still does all this. It’s not as bad as the $75 37” lcd that’s heavily subsidized but that’s only partially because of less intrusive ads. The ads are still there, just not as much, the data collection is still there, and the tv is just runs smoother because the hardware is generally (a bit) more powerful

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think that even the most expensive TVs have the same OS and data collection

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago

Maybe, but no ads though. I guarantee Bill Gates does not see ads on his TV.