this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
1869 points (98.6% liked)

Malicious Compliance

19562 readers
2 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 244 points 3 weeks ago (27 children)

I always refused to put work apps on my personal phone because they would make you agree to some bullshit where they could remote access your phone or potentially wipe it. So I would refuse and say they needed to provide a company phone for me if it was that important. Most companies are either ok with this or provide a phone, except for one company. This was a software company, and literally everything else about this company was a unicorn of a job. But for some reason they wanted me to have slack on my phone and also wouldn't give me a company phone. So I dug up an old phone, reset it to factory settings, and added slack to that so I could say I did it. Then I put the phone away and they never asked about it again. So I really don't know what the point of that was 🤷

[–] classic@fedia.io 127 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's less cognitively taxing for me if you just comply with whatever I've decided

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 144 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] classic@fedia.io 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

We did it, classic

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Would be less cognitively taxing for them if you did.

load more comments (25 replies)