this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6670 readers
1323 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This one is super old and still references Reddit. A kind soul tried making a custom banner for us a while back, but I didn't get much feedback when I posted about it so I just left things as they are and procrastination took over. I need help. I have zero artistic ability, and suck this sort of thing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

You probably want to list your desired resolution.

[–] nuke@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Look, I already told you I suck at this (I'll find out)

Edit: 960x240, 4:1 ratio appears to be right answer

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

960x240 is what one post said

[–] tal 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

investigates

In my web browser, browsing the lemmy.today Web UI, looking at the homepage for the community, if I take a screenshot, the current banner appears to be displayed at 966x129; the actual underlying image is 4,000x533.

Looking at a different community's banner !imageai@sh.itjust.works, I get 966x240 visible in a screenshot, with the underlying image being 1,792x672.

So at least on my browser and viewed on that Lemmy frontend, I'm a little suspicious -- without looking at the code -- that 966 might be some kind of native target for width. It can clearly handle higher-res, and that might be desirable for some higher-resolution displays or clients, if they leverage that.

EDIT: Man, this should be on some kind of Lemmy community moderation wiki. Like, every moderator shouldn't have to individually figure this out.

EDIT2: One reference to 960x240 that I can find is here, though as I said, it doesn't appear to be quite right for native display resolution -- on my browser, maybe just something wonky with me -- and in that post, they point out that different themes can take advantage of higher resolution.

EDIT3: In the CSS, at least in the current default Lemmy Web UI, it looks like .banner has a max-height attribute of 240px, so I think that it's safe to say that at least in that environment, it won't grow past that.

[–] nuke@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Lemmy mobile apps probably also handle banners differently

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I will zap you with my zat if you don't have an amazing Cake Day!

[–] nuke@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Aww thanks, I will indeed!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)