this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
24 points (59.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7213 readers
554 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democrats aren't attacking Jill Stein because they think she is taking votes from Kamala Harris. No one I know who's voting Green would consider a vote for Harris at this point. They're attacking Jill Stein because they don't want voters to know that there can be a worker-centered party to the left of the Democrats that supports popular policies like Medicare for All, a $25 wage and federally guaranteed housing.

There are 80+ million eligible voters who don't vote at all because they don't see the point. Democrats are okay with this, in fact, they don't want any candidate to their left to appeal to those voters with popular policies.

The fact that the Green Party exists shows that the Democrats aren't pushing the most progressive policies. Jill Stein's candidacy shows that it's possible to support reproductive justice AND be against funding and arming a genocide. That we can end homelessness if we stopped funding endless wars around the globe.

Democrats don't want anyone to the left of them to exist because it's the only way they can convince Americans that Dem policies are "the best that we can do". To Dems, anything else is just "asking for a pony".

Don't fall for it. Despite Dem's desire to have you think otherwise, things don't have to be this way.

Another world is possible.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As opposed to, what?, rooting for accelerationism? Trying to actually make things incrementally better isn't good enough, so burn the whole fucking thing down (but of course in your fantasy you survive...)?

Things were undeniably better under Biden than they were under Trump. Obama was better than Bush. we keep trying to improve shit, and y'all are insisting that breaking it all is better than continual improvement.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Things were undeniably better under Biden than they were under Trump.

In what way exactly?

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Real income is up. Gas prices relative to the value of the dollar are down. Employment is far, far higher than the last year of Trump being in office. Crime is down across the board, esp. violent crime. Inflation is back to the same levels that it was.

People complain about groceries being higher in price, which is true, but the real income has gone up faster than grocery prices. People say that they would rather see prices drop, without understanding that that's deflation, and that deflation is the start of a death-spiral for an economy.

People perceive things differently, but that isn't reflected in the reality.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago

Real income is not up relative to the cost of living. In fact, the situation today is worse than it was under Trump. Employment is absolutely terrible, and the dems have been cooking numbers, with latest report having been revised down by a stunning 800K https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/news/talent-acquisition/us-employment-gains-revised-down-over-800k-jobs

In fact, over a quarter of people are living in subsistence wages unable to make any savings, and nearly 60% of people can't even afford a 1k emergency expense. Furthermore, nearly 6 in 10 U.S. adults are uncomfortable with their level of emergency savings, according to a new Bankrate poll. Before 2022, the percentage had been rising, from 37 percent in 2018 to 44 percent in 2020, 48 percent in 2021 and 58 percent in 2022. This year, it’s barely budged from 57 percent in 2023.

Crime is down across the board, esp. violent crime

[citation needed] especially one that explains what specific policies dems passed that caused crime to go down

People complain about groceries being higher in price, which is true, but the real income has gone up faster than grocery prices.

[citation needed]

People say that they would rather see prices drop, without understanding that that’s deflation, and that deflation is the start of a death-spiral for an economy.

People say they want their cost of living to go down. Seems to me that you're the one who doesn't understand what the implications of people not being able to afford basic needs are. Spending drops, people start defaulting on debt, companies aren't able to sell goods, leading to layoffs, and that's how economic crises start.

People perceive things differently, but that isn’t reflected in the reality.

Your comment is a perfect example of this phenomenon.