this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
32 points (97.1% liked)

Games

16923 readers
1426 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Paradachshund 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Why are they doing it? Legal troubles? I didn't see any explanation in the article.

[–] subignition@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The article links to a previous article about the online service for the free to play version shutting down. It looks like the Complete edition is an offline version where all the content will be available through gameplay without microtransactions, where the events will rotate every 4 years. HTH

[–] Paradachshund 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Right, that's the article that doesn't explain why they're doing it.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

Probably because they're shifting development work to something else. Doing it this way and making it run offline frees up developers.

[–] subignition@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

It's reportedly been running for seven years, so I suppose I just assumed that they didn't want to pay to maintain the online service for all eternity.

The other reply's probably also got a good point in terms of actual staff doing support for it, too.