U.S. News

2244 readers

57 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.

Guidelines for submissions:

Post the original source of information as the link.
If there is any Nazi imagery in the linked story, mark your post NSFW.
If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
Social media is not a news source.

For World News, see the News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

Powderhorn@beehaw.org

We are about to watch the collapse of journalism in real time. (beehaw.org)

submitted 3 weeks ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/usnews@beehaw.org

64 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What is happening with editorial boards is not normal. You need to understand this first.

They are not part of the newsroom, so anyone telling you that is lying. What happened at the LAT and WaPo are the beginning. Have you not read history? They come for you. You just think it's more steps away.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What are you referring to?

[–] JCPhoenix@beehaw.org 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Major stories from last week, concerning the Washington Post and L.A. Times refusing to endorse a presidential candidate. In both situations, the ownership veto'd the paper's editorial board, which traditionally endorses candidates.

'Washington Post' won't endorse in White House race for first time since 1980s (NPR)

'Los Angeles Times' editor resigns after newspaper withholds presidential endorsement (NPR)

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Thank you. I don't have the energy.

[–] JCPhoenix@beehaw.org 10 points 3 weeks ago

No worries. Crazy times we live in. Have lived in. Continue to live in. Tiring, indeed.

[–] Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So the owners are being threatened and / or bribed by Trump to keep quiet? Or are they that scared of the fallout in the near future?

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 6 points 3 weeks ago

Yes. They want to be positioned to benefit from government contracts.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is not where I'm going to provide media literacy. We're a bit past that.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Okay, well it seems a bit odd for a news community mod to post a vague rant, which isn't news, and then not explain themselves.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you found that vague, I question your news diet.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So you’re speaking only to people who are not aware of the #1 or #2 biggest story of the last 24 hours, but are eager to get themselves fully up to speed on it from somewhere else, based on only the vaguest of hints?

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's fair. I presumed exactly the knowledge I was trying to share.

[–] sarsaparilyptus@beehaw.org 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well at least you got a chance to huff your own farts.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Let's be a bit more careful than that.

[–] millie@beehaw.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

The level of self-reflection you exhibit in this thread is absolutely abysmal.