Privacy

32130 readers

1226 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What is the scariest permission that an app can have? (iOS and Android) (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by rosa666parks@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

To me, it’s gotta be the microphone

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Charger8232@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

This depends on what you're trying to defend against. In my opinion (on GrapheneOS):

"Accessibility" permission (i.e. full control of the device)
"Network" permission
"Modify system settings" permission
"Install unknown apps" permission
Any permission that allows apps to communicate with one another (such as a reduced sandbox, file permission, or app communication scopes)

Those are the only permissions that I can think of off the top of my head that could potentially allow an app to phone home. Turning off Wi-Fi for the device does little if the app also has the "Wi-Fi control" permission.