this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
92 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5245 readers
342 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
92
215 million hectares of forest – an area bigger than Mexico – could grow back by itself, if we can just leave it alone. (theconversation.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by Dot@feddit.org to c/climate@slrpnk.net
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thats the trick ain't it? This whole thing would fix itself if we would leave everything alone. We won't.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There’s just too many of us to support this level of greed and inequality.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's not about the amount of people when the top 10 own like 40% of everything.

But yeah, your sentence is still correct; the level of greed just comes from a tiny minority of people.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It is about the amount of people, at this level of greed. Everyone wants a house in the suburbs.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

No, not everyone does.

Besides, we could probably utilise a lot of area sustainably to increase suburbs, worldwide, if we didn't live in this wageslave bullshit where only the top hogs all the money while not giving a fuck about sustainability or employee well being.

[–] spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Is inequality actually the problem when it comes to carbon? Just as a thought exercise, if everyone on earth, or even within each county, received an equal share of GDP, I suspect emissions may increase. You'd replace the private jets with more of everything else. Inequality is a major issue for a host of other reasons though, absolutely.