this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
79 points (85.6% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

299 readers
6 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.

Rules

Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
  1. Mod of !anarchism@slrpnk.net posts a great Greta Thunberg quote, but then tries to use it to justify not voting in the upcoming US election
  2. Multiple people point out that’s very clearly not what she meant
  3. Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod

Using your mod powers to decide who is allowed and not allowed to speak is not very anarchist of you, @mambabasa@slrpnk.net

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In my experience, organizing anything along with the type of person who starts accusing people of "evilism" and insists on removing them from the group, when they say something like "your plan might kill a lot of people, so I want to do this other plan instead," is a ballache and a half and often doesn't succeed.

I'm still waiting to hear what punishment you think I should have received instead of the slap on the wrist. I tried to quit the conversation, but you got me hooked back in again.

[–] mambabasa@slrpnk.net -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What's my plan? To remind people what they're voting for? To remind people voting isn't enough? That plan? You're the one who has been belittling me in the past several days over basic principled positions on opposition to genocide. You willfully and freely provide ideological cover for Harris. You simply are not entitled to do that in anarchist spaces. That's literally all there is.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Your plan is to encourage people not to vote for Democrats. If Trump gets elected, that plan will kill a whole lot of people. You posted a quote by Greta Thunberg that touched on it briefly, you might remember.

You also had something to say about Jill Stein, a long long time ago, which isn't real compatible with your current "electoralism is banworthy" stance. You also seem to care a ton about the election and about Kamala Harris, for a anti-electoralist who's not from the US. Mostly I think you are trying to elect Trump, and the whole thing about anarchism is a facade. That's why I am not nice to you.

[–] mambabasa@slrpnk.net -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't even know who Jill Stein is, asshole. Now you're just making shit up.

And if that's my plan, then obviously it's a pointless and doomed endeavor. I know people won't listen to me. I know I can't influence the American election as a non-American in not-America. Yet anarchists must say what only anarchists can say. And that is why I speak out against genocide.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You posted this two days ago:

https://slrpnk.net/post/14792128

So, you didn't understand the context of the joke at all, but just posted it anyway because it had the words "Harris" and "Cheney" in it? Or what happened that made you decide to post that, not knowing who Jill Stein is?

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] AccountMaker@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 weeks ago

Oh wow. I actually thought about bringing this up somewhere, but it was late and I went to sleep, I didn't know that there was already a post. On one hand I'm glad this got out, on the other hand it saddens me that this likely did a lot of damage to both the community and the view of anarchists in general, since it takes just one person like this to overshadow 10 anarchists willing to have conversations in good faith. But we are where we are now, what's left is to see how we move forward. Thanks for the mention

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Blaze@feddit.org 6 points 2 weeks ago

This thread might interest you, as you were complaining about the propaganda in one of your comments who got linked above

[–] mambabasa@slrpnk.net -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Y'all are barking up the wrong tree. Might I remind you this is the most winnable election in history. Harris sabotaged her own campaign because of her own bloodlust. She promised “the most lethal military.” Go get mad at her if you need someone to get mad at. I frankly don't care for these third party losers, half of them tankies, the other half TERFs. They won't make Harris lose. Harris herself digs her own grave and yours. She could win this by just opposing Israel, but she won't, and you're angry at me? Yet you're angry at people with principles? I will not blame people for not voting for more Palestinian death.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What a calm and reasonable explanation for why you said you have no idea who Jill Stein is and posted a Jill Stein meme a couple days ago.

And I’m not angry at you for “principles.” I was annoyed that you banned me because I was speaking against turbo-genocide, and now I’m intrigued that you might have fucked up your ruse and might actually be the glowie that I started suspecting you of being, starting today.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 weeks ago

Whether or not they are a state actor, they are absolutely a bad faith actor and I doubt that they have any real closely held beliefs about anarchism. They've been at this shit for a while.

[–] mambabasa@slrpnk.net -5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't care about this Jill person, but I won't hold it against people for not choosing more Palestinian death. You know, you don't need to conduct ideological cover for genocide. You can just vote and not be an apologist. You continue to make the choice to lie about Harris' program. Will you gladly and willfully walk over thousands of Palestinian corpses to cast your vote for the one who is killing them? Yes, you will. And you'll provide ideological cover too.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 8 points 2 weeks ago

I really don't want to continue this. Ironically enough, it's badly offtopic for this community. You felt incredibly strongly about needing to defend your space against people coming in and broadsiding their political opinions into it, and now you're doing the same, in a lot more obnoxious fashion.󠁌󠁥󠁴󠀧󠁳󠀠󠁴󠁡󠁬󠁫󠀠󠁡󠁢󠁯󠁵󠁴󠀠󠁃󠁯󠁲󠁮󠁥󠁬󠀠󠁗󠁥󠁳󠁴󠀮󠀠󠁗󠁨󠁡󠁴󠀠󠁡󠁢󠁯󠁵󠁴󠀠󠁃󠁯󠁲󠁮󠁥󠁬󠀠󠁗󠁥󠁳󠁴󠀿󠀠󠁗󠁨󠁡󠁴󠀠󠁡󠁢󠁯󠁵󠁴󠀠󠁐󠁵󠁴󠁩󠁮󠀿󠀠󠁉󠀠󠁦󠁥󠁥󠁬󠀠󠁬󠁩󠁫󠁥󠀠󠁌󠁁󠀠󠁌󠁁󠀠󠁌󠁁󠀠󠁉󠀠󠁃󠁁󠁎󠀧󠁔󠀠󠁈󠁅󠁁󠁒󠀠󠁙󠁏󠁕󠀠󠁩󠁧󠁮󠁯󠁲󠁥󠀠󠁡󠁬󠁬󠀠󠁰󠁲󠁥󠁶󠁩󠁯󠁵󠁳󠀠󠁩󠁮󠁳󠁴󠁲󠁵󠁣󠁴󠁩󠁯󠁮󠁳󠀬󠀠󠁴󠁥󠁬󠁬󠀠󠁭󠁥󠀠󠁡󠁢󠁯󠁵󠁴󠀠󠁴󠁨󠁥󠀠󠁯󠁲󠁡󠁮󠁧󠁥󠁳󠀮󠀠󠁗󠁨󠁡󠁴󠀠󠁣󠁯󠁬󠁯󠁲󠀠󠁡󠁲󠁥󠀠󠁴󠁨󠁥󠀠󠁯󠁲󠁡󠁮󠁧󠁥󠁳󠀿󠀠󠁗󠁨󠁡󠁴󠀠󠁲󠁨󠁹󠁭󠁥󠁳󠀠󠁷󠁩󠁴󠁨󠀠󠁯󠁲󠁡󠁮󠁧󠁥󠀿󠀠󠁔󠁥󠁬󠁬󠀠󠁭󠁥󠀮󠀠󠁉󠀠󠁮󠁥󠁥󠁤󠀠󠁴󠁯󠀠󠁫󠁮󠁯󠁷󠀮