Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
Funny not convicted of rape. The felonies will get overturned in appeals. No clue what the horse comment is about.
The judge literally said that it was rape. Keep deflecting...
I get you don’t understand the difference between civil and criminal law but Trump does not have a conviction for rape. It’s that simple
I get that you want to cover for the rapist, but the judge literally said what he was convicted of met the legal definition of rape. So, maybe quit defending rapists?
Maybe learn the difference between civil and criminal liability.