this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
499 points (91.2% liked)

People Twitter

5210 readers
2160 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 4 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Someone inherits their wealth. You realize this, right?

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (6 children)

please run the experiment with a sufficient sample size and let me know the results.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ok well if you don't have any evidence I'm going to dismiss your conclusion.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not providing anything because the fact that inheritances exist isn't something that requires a peer reviewed study.

But you know this since you're being intentionally obtuse.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

your assertion isn't that inheritances exist, but that removing billionaires will result in more billionaires continuing the destruction of the planet. there is no evidence for this, since billionaire removal has not been tested.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The people who inherit the billions will be the billionaires who take their place. I'm not sure why this is such a hard concept to grasp.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

but we don't know that they would continue the actions that led to their predecessors removal. it's an interesting theory and we can test it!!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)