this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
16 points (90.0% liked)
Coffee
8376 readers
1 users here now
☕ - The hot beverage that powers the world!
Coffee gadgets - It's always great to learn about new gadgets. Please share your favorite hardware or full setups. It might inspire newcomers to experiment!
Local businesses - Please promote your local businesses. If you are not the owner of the business you are promoting, kindly ask the owner if it's okay. It would be great if the business has a physical store to include an exterior or interior shot.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I wouldn't consider these huge issues, but there's 3 areas where I think the miir design suffers relative to the chemex. The pourover part looks like just a single wall. Obviously the chemex is, too, but according to a quick look on wikipedia, stainless has ~10x the thermal conductivity of borosilicate glass, so your brew chamber is going to cool more quickly. No clue if it would be enough to make a difference in brew temp, though.
The stainless carafe part sounds good, too, but stainless travel mugs almost always get lots of coffee residue buildup, and it's a bit of a process to get them properly clean to the point where you don't smell it. I always end up washing with baking soda and/or citric acid a few times. Glass stays cleaner, and it's also easier to see how clean it is.
Lastly, it might just be me, but every once in a while, my scale times out if I'm doing other stuff while making coffee, or I'll make coffee without a scale. It's really nice to be able to see visually how much coffee there is in the carafe.
Glass has double the heat capacity, and I would assume greater mass due to thicker construction. So unless you are preheating fully to boiling temps first every time, there will be more heat loss to the glass over the course of ~1-3 minutes
Conductivity is more germane to heat loss through the material. Borosilicate glass' specific heat is also roughly twice that of steel, at around 0.830 J/g C to 316 steel's 0.468 J/g C. Glass will absorb and retain more heat for longer;steel will absorb energy and heat up more quickly, and dump it just as fast.
I mean, we're taking about millimeters of material; the quality of the cozy will have far more impact than the container material.
Which was my point - 400g of room temperature ceramic is going to absorb way more heat from 250ml of boiling water than would be lost from the glass-air (or even steel-air) interface during the 2 minutes it takes to do a pourover.
If both cones are preheated thoroughly, yes, the steel cone will shed heat faster, however I feel like this is also negligible compared to evaporative heat loss and subsequent transfer to a cup
Yah, you may be right. I'm at the limit of my materials science knowledge, here.